Ask Question
13 July, 07:39

Under roman law, someone accusing another person of a crime needed belief that the accused was guilty. proof that a crime had been committed. a lawyer willing to take the case to trial. a witness to vouch for the accuser's character.

+1
Answers (1)
  1. 13 July, 10:47
    0
    I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is the second option. Under roman law, someone accusing another person of a crime needed proof that a crime had been committed. The accused h ad the right to face the accuser and offer a defense.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Under roman law, someone accusing another person of a crime needed belief that the accused was guilty. proof that a crime had been ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers