In Worcester v. Georgia (1832), why did the Supreme Court rule that Georgia did not have the authority to remove the Cherokees from their land?
Only the federal government had the authority to deal with a sovereign nation.
Only federal law, not state law, applies to American Indian individuals.
It was illegal for Georgia to take this land from an individual.
Cherokee land was considered federal land and did not belong to Georgia.
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “In Worcester v. Georgia (1832), why did the Supreme Court rule that Georgia did not have the authority to remove the Cherokees from their ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
When did the Renaissance begin and end?
Answers (2)
Which of the following are basic human rights?
Answers (1)
Which of the following European diseases ravaged American Indian populations in the 1500s? Check all of the boxes that apply. smallpox influenza measles
Answers (1)
What two laws were passed in 1906 to protect consumers?
Answers (1)
The English Bill of Rights was Parliament's response to The bill contained provisions that It also ensured that could never become monarchs of England
Answers (1)
New Questions in History
Which of the three branches has the powers to make laws?
Answers (2)
What are the basic characteristics of civilizations?
Answers (1)
Why did martin luther king and his followers oppose the granting of indulgences
Answers (1)
If anyone needs a quick responce to a question or just wants to talk im here
Answers (1)
Kennedy supported a bill that would raise the minimum wage, or lowest legal pay per hour. Did You Think It Passed?
Answers (1)