Read this sentence from a summary about some Americans' reactions to immigration in the late 1800s.
Everyone who held nativist views was a cruel person.
Why would this sentence be inappropriate in an objective historical summary?
It is off topic.
It is too detailed.
It expresses an opinion.
It expresses emotion.
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Read this sentence from a summary about some Americans' reactions to immigration in the late 1800s. Everyone who held nativist views was a ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
Which two union states are farthest west
Answers (2)
The main purpose of Lewis and Clark's Journey was to
Answers (2)
This organization tries to keep friendly agreements between countries and sends in troops to keep peace around the world, often supported by countries such as the United States. 1. United Nations 2. World Court 3. World Trade Organization 4.
Answers (1)
Which of the following inventions did Eli Whitney contribute to the Industrial Revolution?
Answers (2)
Cuál fue el resultado de la intervención de los Aliados en la guerra civil de Rusia?
Answers (1)
New Questions in History
The new industrial system that manufacturers developed in the early nineteenth century:
Answers (1)
Which was not a result of the slave trade conducted by europeans in west africa?
Answers (1)
What can modern nations learn from the Ming Dynasty?
Answers (1)
When technology advances, which of the following always takes place? O A. Devices are designed B. Results are improved O C. Inventions are made D. Efficiency is achieved
Answers (1)
Which of the following best summarizes the result of attacks in no-man's-land during World War I? a.) Attacks in no-man's-land were never attempted. b.) Attacks in no-man's-land were frequently attempted. c.
Answers (1)