Ask Question
11 April, 15:39

A man is convicted of a crime but did not have an attorney to represent him at his trial. Under what circumstances would this be unconstitutional according to Gideon v. Wainwright? If the man was unable to afford an attorney and the court refused to provide one If the man chose to not use his right to an attorney and represent himself If the man was insane and no attorney would choose to represent him If the man was unaware that he had the right to be represented by an attorney

+4
Answers (2)
  1. 11 April, 16:44
    0
    A. If the man was unable to afford an attorney and the court refused to provide one.

    The court is obligated to provide an attorney for citizens incapable of affording them.
  2. 11 April, 18:57
    0
    If the man was unable to afford an attorney and the court refused to provide one I am a pro at this kind of history
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “A man is convicted of a crime but did not have an attorney to represent him at his trial. Under what circumstances would this be ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers