What would be one colonial advantage to referring to this event as "The Bloody Massacre? (In other words, how could this incident benefit the colonists by referring to it as a bloody massacre?)

a. in order to gain support for the British king

b. in order to give the colonists a common cause against Britain, and separate from it

c. in order to blame colonists for the event

d. in order to make Bostonians seem weak

Question

History

Guest

24 May, 13:07

What would be one colonial advantage to referring to this event as "The Bloody Massacre? (In other words, how could this incident benefit the colonists by referring to it as a bloody massacre?)

a. in order to gain support for the British king

b. in order to give the colonists a common cause against Britain, and separate from it

c. in order to blame colonists for the event

d. in order to make Bostonians seem weak

+5

Answers (2)

Know the Answer?

Kayden Wilkinson · Answer 1

Kayden Wilkinson 24 May, 13:24

0

A or b is the best answer

Nathaniel Wilkins · Answer 2

The answer would be B because this would make everyone think that it was the fault of the British, and giving them a stronger reason to separate from England.