Ask Question
23 October, 14:01

Which of the following describes an advantage oral history has over written history? A. Oral history creates primary sources, while written history creates only secondary sources. B. Oral history is generally credible, while written history often contains biases. C. Oral history can engage and entertain listeners by using music, rhythm, and poetry. D. Oral history can only be performed by experts with a great deal of historical knowledge.

+5
Answers (1)
  1. 23 October, 16:06
    0
    Among the choices, the one that describes an advantage oral history has over written history is C, Oral history can engage and entertain listeners by using music, rhythm, and poetry. They aren't considered primary sources because they can be changed as time goes on, depending on the storyteller.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Which of the following describes an advantage oral history has over written history? A. Oral history creates primary sources, while written ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers