Ask Question
HistoryHistory
9 March, 02:37

A secondary source is not useful and should not be used for academic purposes. t/f

+1
Answers (1)
  1. 9 March, 03:57
    0
    Secondary sources could be useful in some reaches of academic purposes. I would say the answer is false.

    Secondary sources are like documents written after an event occurred. Secondary sources offer another perspective on things.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “A secondary source is not useful and should not be used for academic purposes. t/f ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
How has the popularity of Cinco de Mayo impacted the celebration of the holiday?
Answers (1)
Why is Haiti considered a least developed nation? A:excessive poverty B:human rights violations C:extreme love of infrastructure D:all of the above
Answers (1)
What are the main four reasons the Chinese immigrants to America?
Answers (1)
How many americans watched nixon's resgign speech
Answers (1)
What was the primary goal of the women's suffrage movement
Answers (2)
New Questions in History
Which campaign strategy was used in the election of 1828 and is still used today?
Answers (1)
What was the advantage of using transistors instead of vacuum tubes in the second-generation computers?
Answers (1)
Describe the Paleolithic Era
Answers (1)
What kind of impact did the suez crisis have on the US - Soviet relations
Answers (2)
Describe Christians' reactions to heretics in the middle ages.
Answers (1)
Home » History » A secondary source is not useful and should not be used for academic purposes. t/f
Sign Up Forgot Password?