Ask Question
2 April, 07:07

Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source when analyzing a historical event?

+1
Answers (1)
  1. 2 April, 08:42
    0
    Well sometimes you may not have access to a document that was made during the same time period as the historical subject that is being studied. Therefore, a secondary source would be better to use to understand more about subject you are studing.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source when analyzing a historical event? ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers