Ask Question
21 September, 19:01

Many Floridians are concerned about gun control. Some people believe that limiting access to firearms may make the nation safer. Others believe that this goes against their rights as Americans. What about a compromise? Keep all firearms, but add a new, large tax on ammunition. Which change to the article would show bias in favor of one side of the gun-control debate?

+2
Answers (1)
  1. 21 September, 21:16
    0
    I'm from Florida, and yes if Florida gets that it'll make some of our rights go away, yes people uses them for bad sometimes but than there's people who carries them incase of something bad happening or people who likes to hunt in the woods. It'll give away their right to carry guns. It won't make us safer, if someone attacks what will happen than? hand in hand combat? what if the other person has a gun? so no it won't make us safer. Adding tax on ammunition wouldn't be right, because the Army and everyone who serves the United States of America needs those weapons to fight. I don't think they should have it. But I think they should keep criminals from having them.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Many Floridians are concerned about gun control. Some people believe that limiting access to firearms may make the nation safer. Others ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers