Ask Question
HistoryHistory
29 September, 02:36

When analyzing a source, historians want to remain

+1
Answers (1)
  1. 29 September, 04:39
    0
    When analyzing sources, historians obviously want to stay and remain neutral due do the implications a biased historian might have. If historians wouldn't be neutral, this would make them very bad as having a biased view of history is something historians and the whole field of history would like to avoid.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “When analyzing a source, historians want to remain ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
Where did germany conquer during the first two years of world war two
Answers (2)
Historically where did the two party system begin?
Answers (1)
5. The passage "Reconstruction" is mostly about A. the time period after the Civil War in the South B. building weapons during the Civil War C. how buildings were built in the South D. how plantations in the South were different after the war
Answers (1)
Battle of passchendaele significance and who won the battle?
Answers (1)
Evaluate the extent to which Jacksonians should be considered the guardians of the US Constitution, political democracy, personal liberties and equal economic opportunity.
Answers (1)
New Questions in History
Do you agree with the evolution of Jefferson personality?
Answers (1)
What was the impact of the spanish settlers on the native populations?
Answers (1)
What was the first English colony in North America? A) Virginia B) Massachusetts C) Rhode Island D) Georgia
Answers (1)
The Japanese military code taught soldiers that?
Answers (1)
The places were varieties of rock are cut out of tge ground are called
Answers (1)
Home » History » When analyzing a source, historians want to remain
Sign Up Forgot Password?