How did the case united states v.

e.

c. knight weaken the sherman antitrust act?

a. the supreme court ruled that the american sugar company was a legal monopoly since it existed only in one state.

b. the supreme court ruled that the american sugar company was a legal monopoly since it operated in several states.

c. the supreme court ruled in favor of the american sugar company since it controlled only fifty percent of the sugar-refining factories.

d. the supreme court ruled against the american sugar company since it controlled ninety-eight percent of the sugar-refining factories.

Question

History

Emery Romero

17 March, 23:24

How did the case united states v.

e.

c. knight weaken the sherman antitrust act?

a. the supreme court ruled that the american sugar company was a legal monopoly since it existed only in one state.

b. the supreme court ruled that the american sugar company was a legal monopoly since it operated in several states.

c. the supreme court ruled in favor of the american sugar company since it controlled only fifty percent of the sugar-refining factories.

d. the supreme court ruled against the american sugar company since it controlled ninety-eight percent of the sugar-refining factories.

+2

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Jordyn Mosley · Answer 1

The court asserted, because such operations occur entirely in one state. in short, congress has the power to regulate trade but not manufacturing. so it would be, A the supreme court ruled that the american sugar company was a legal monopoly since it existed only in one state.