Two arguments about a historical event contradict each other. How should historians determine which argument is superior? A. Poll people who live near the location where the historical event happened. B. Trust the argument made by the more educated, respected person. C. Search for additional evidence to see which argument it supports. D. Prefer the simpler argument to the more complex argument.
Answers (2)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Two arguments about a historical event contradict each other. How should historians determine which argument is superior? A. Poll people ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
What economic system may promote laziness?
Answers (2)
What was the main factor that caused the new imperialism
Answers (1)
What were some of the problems that resulted from the weaknesses of the articles of confederation?
Answers (1)
What is a example of an imported good?
Answers (2)
What was one of the main reasons the transatlantic slave trade was so harmful to africa
Answers (1)
New Questions in History
How did cities change in countries affected by the industrial revolution
Answers (2)
President abraham Lincoln plans for reconstruction after the civil war included
Answers (1)
Why is the huang he also known as the yellow river
Answers (1)
Explain how Fascist and Nazi ideals spread to the rest of the world in the 1930's.
Answers (1)
Explain why each branch of government "checks" the other two branches.
Answers (2)