Ask Question
27 December, 17:21

In the fictional Stolen Valor Act case of US v. Fields, the prosecution argued that Fields's lie was? A. aintentional. B. protected by free speech. C. damaging to soldiers. D. unintentional.

+2
Answers (1)
  1. 27 December, 20:58
    0
    C) Damaging to soildiers
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “In the fictional Stolen Valor Act case of US v. Fields, the prosecution argued that Fields's lie was? A. aintentional. B. protected by free ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers