Ask Question
25 August, 04:00

Which statement would most likely be made by an opponent of the Supreme Court's decision in Engel v. Vitale?

A. People should not have to restrict their free exercise of religion just because they happen to be in a school.

B. Public institutions need to avoid any involvement with religious activity, even if it seems minor or harmless.

C. Students who do not practice a religion need to feel comfortable in and supported by their public schools.

D. Religious activity in public schools is a dangerous violation of the separation of church and state.

+4
Answers (2)
  1. 25 August, 05:07
    0
    The statement that would most likely be made by an opponent of the Supreme Court's decision in Engel v. Vital is: A. People should not have to restrict their free exercise of religion just because they happen to be in a school.

    The case ruled that forcing public school students to do a morning prayer is unconstitutional because it somehow violates one of the basic right of the constitution, the freedom of religion.
  2. 25 August, 07:39
    0
    A is indeed correct Apex
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Which statement would most likely be made by an opponent of the Supreme Court's decision in Engel v. Vitale? A. People should not have to ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers