Smith, a candidate running against the current senator, says, "the senator has voted against health care. she is not in line with the principles of our party." jones, the senator, responds, "my esteemed opponent neglected to mention i only voted against a health care bill once, because it would have actually reduced citizen benefits." smith is using omission to reduce support for jones biased language to increase support for jones emotional appeal to reduce support for smith factual accuracy to increase support for smith

Question

History

Nelson Williamson

13 August, 14:49

Smith, a candidate running against the current senator, says, "the senator has voted against health care. she is not in line with the principles of our party." jones, the senator, responds, "my esteemed opponent neglected to mention i only voted against a health care bill once, because it would have actually reduced citizen benefits." smith is using omission to reduce support for jones biased language to increase support for jones emotional appeal to reduce support for smith factual accuracy to increase support for smith

+2

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Imani · Answer 1

The correct answer to this question is "to reduce support for jones biased language." Smith, a candidate running against the current senator, says, "the senator has voted against health care. she is not in line with the principles of our party." Smith is using omission in order to reduce support for jones biased language.