Ask Question
2 August, 20:15

Why were Motte and Bailey castles replaced by stone castles?

+4
Answers (2)
  1. 2 August, 20:43
    0
    Stone keeps replaced Motte and Bailey castles because the keeps had many defensive mechanisms unlike the Motte and Bailey that were open to being set on fire. In addition, Stone castles were more durable unlike the Motte and Bailey that were made of wood.
  2. 2 August, 21:04
    0
    Because they were stronger and more efficient
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Why were Motte and Bailey castles replaced by stone castles? ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers