Which of the following could be limitations to being able to use a precedent to decide a court case? (Select all that apply.)

Some of the facts of the original case are significantly different than the current case.

The original case was decided in a different type of court than the current case.

The judge in the original case did not have jurisdiction to try the case.

The ruling was made by a lower court than the court hearing the current case.

The judge in the ruling case did not use all the facts presented when making a decision.

Question

Law

Pig

4 May, 20:22

Which of the following could be limitations to being able to use a precedent to decide a court case? (Select all that apply.)

Some of the facts of the original case are significantly different than the current case.

The original case was decided in a different type of court than the current case.

The judge in the original case did not have jurisdiction to try the case.

The ruling was made by a lower court than the court hearing the current case.

The judge in the ruling case did not use all the facts presented when making a decision.

+2

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Estes · Answer 1

The judge in the original case did not have jurisdiction to try the case.

The ruling was made by a lower court than the court hearing the current case.

this one makes some sense

Explanation:

if they both get charged the judge can make them speak