Which of the following is true regarding the protection of "fighting words" under the First Amendment? a. Fighting words are unprotected speech under the First Amendmentb. Fighting words are protected speech under the First Amendment only if they are uttered by an individual citizen, not by a corporate representativec. Fighting words are protected speech under the First Amendment only if they involve political activityd. Fighting words are protected speech under the First Amendment only if they are made in connection with a protest marche. Fighting words are protected speech under the First Amendment only if they are made in conjunction with self defense

Question

Law

Collin Ochoa

24 February, 14:42

Which of the following is true regarding the protection of "fighting words" under the First Amendment? a. Fighting words are unprotected speech under the First Amendmentb. Fighting words are protected speech under the First Amendment only if they are uttered by an individual citizen, not by a corporate representativec. Fighting words are protected speech under the First Amendment only if they involve political activityd. Fighting words are protected speech under the First Amendment only if they are made in connection with a protest marche. Fighting words are protected speech under the First Amendment only if they are made in conjunction with self defense

+5

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Colin Mckenzie · Answer 1

The statement that is true is: a. Fighting words are unprotected speech under the First Amendment.

Explanation:

The freedom of speech, which is a right included in the Constitution of the United States, has his limitations. For instance, fighting words, which are words that are used to show disconfort or disagreement of some sort became unprotected. The First Amendment does not protect fighing words, and the governmen is allow to limit speech when words said can bring fighting or disturbance.