Ask Question
9 February, 17:43

In the case of Miller v. Ratner, the Maryland court upheld the prohibition against claims for: Breach of promise to marry. True or False?

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 9 February, 18:58
    0
    TRUE

    Explanation:

    Lonnie Miller and Warren Ratner started dating in 1990 and both of them lives together in Ratner's apartment. Lonnie sued that her boyfriend forced her out of the apartment after living with him for three years with a promise that she will be married by Ratner. She further stated that this came up because she was diagnosed with breast cancer.

    The Court of Special Appeals upheld a Montgomery County Circuit Court stance on dismissing the appeal on the basis of 'breach of promise to marry', citing that the clause has long be abolished over decades ago by the legislature. and should not be subject for debate.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “In the case of Miller v. Ratner, the Maryland court upheld the prohibition against claims for: Breach of promise to marry. True or False? ...” in 📘 Law if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers