Law

Kyson Stone

29 June, 01:49

The Supreme Court held that officers who were in hot pursuit of an armed robbery suspect acted reasonably when they entered the house and began to search for the man because "the Fourth Amendment does not require police officers to delay in the course of an investigation if to do so would gravely endanger their lives or the lives of others" in:a. Payton v. New York b. Warden v. Hayden c. United States v. Watson d. Tennessee v. Garner

+1

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Not Sure About the Answer?

Find an answer to your question ✅ “The Supreme Court held that officers who were in hot pursuit of an armed robbery suspect acted reasonably when they entered the house and ...” in 📘 Law if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.

Search for Other Answers

You Might be Interested in

Examples of moderate damage are: A.) a broken windows B.) tilting C.) cracks larger than 1/4 inches D.) heavy smoke or fire

Is the antitrust law still in affect? There seem to be alot of manufacturers that only have one distributor. Why is that?

Fancorp regularly trades in securities on a national exchange. Which of the following is true concerning the company's requirement to report to the SEC?

What is the Democratic Party's position on taxing business and individuals in the economy?

What does a platform committee do? A. recruits party members B. develops policy statements

New Questions in Law

What role does communication technology play in homeland security, and what problems were identified by the 9/11 Commission as issues

What's the crime name? to sell human

A lack of blank is a major factor in traffic crashes

Are there any types of speech that should not be protected under law? Explain.

Which laws was passed to regulate unfair competitive practices and practices that deceive or are unfair to consumers?