Ask Question
13 October, 17:04

When scholars and justices interpret the Constitution with the view that the courts should reject any active lawmaking functions and follow precedent, refers to

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 13 October, 19:45
    0
    When scholars and justices interpret the Constitution with the view that the courts should reject any active lawmaking functions and follow precedent, refers to Judicial Restraint.

    Explanation:

    The judicial branch is conferred with the power of interpretation of the law. Many times while exercising the power of judicial activism there is always a chance that justices may exceed their power. Hence, the theory of judicial restraint was evolved.

    By judicial restraint, judges are encouraged to exercise their power with certain limits and to respect and follow stare decisis. This ensures that judges are not intruding into the realm of the legislature by involving themselves in law making.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “When scholars and justices interpret the Constitution with the view that the courts should reject any active lawmaking functions and follow ...” in 📘 Law if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers