Ask Question
21 December, 18:52

In Escobedo v. Illinois (1964), the Supreme Court held that:

a. no Miranda warning is required during a stop and frisk.

b. Miranda does not need to be given by private police.

c. an individual being investigated by police may not be denied counsel.

d. indigent defendants are entitled to a lawyer when seeking an appeal.

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 21 December, 22:45
    0
    I think the answer is c
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “In Escobedo v. Illinois (1964), the Supreme Court held that: a. no Miranda warning is required during a stop and frisk. b. Miranda does not ...” in 📘 Law if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers