Ask Question
13 September, 19:19

Choose the abbreviation of the postulate or theorem that supports the conclusion that WAS NOT. Given: A = O, W = N, SW = TN.

+5
Answers (1)
  1. 13 September, 20:02
    0
    The answer is ASA.

    Given that ∠A = ∠O, ∠W = ∠N, SW = TN, this shows that the two angles (∠A and ∠W) and the included side SW of the first triangle are equal to the two angles (∠O and ∠N) and the included side TN of the second triangle. This means that third angles ∠S and ∠T are also equal. Therefore, the two triangles ΔWAS and ΔNOT are congruent based from the ASA Postulate.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Choose the abbreviation of the postulate or theorem that supports the conclusion that WAS NOT. Given: A = O, W = N, SW = TN. ...” in 📘 Mathematics if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers