Ask Question
29 September, 15:40

A certain 3 -ft by 3 -ft rubber shop-floor mat costs $43. A 3 -ft by 4 -ft foam mat costs $27. Which of these mats has the lower cost per square foot, and how much lower is it?

+5
Answers (1)
  1. 29 September, 16:40
    0
    Step-by-step explanation:

    A certain 3 -ft by 3 -ft rubber shop-floor mat costs $43. Since both sides of the mat are equal, it means that the mat is a square. Area of a square is expressed as Length^2.

    The length of the 3 -ft by 3 -ft is

    3^2 = 9ft^2

    If 9ft^2 cost 43

    Then 1ft^2 costs $

    x = 43/9 = $4.78 per square foot

    A 3 -ft by 4 -ft foam mat costs $27

    Since both sides of the foam mat are unequal, it means that the foam mat is a rectangle. Area of a rectangle is expressed as Length * width

    The length is 4 -ft and the width is

    3 -ft

    Area of the foam mat = 4*3 = 12 ft^2

    If 12ft^2 cost 27

    Then 1ft^2 costs $y

    y = 27/12 = $2.25 per square foot

    The foam mat is cheaper because it has a lower cost per square foot

    Difference in cost is $4.78 - 2.25

    = $2.53
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “A certain 3 -ft by 3 -ft rubber shop-floor mat costs $43. A 3 -ft by 4 -ft foam mat costs $27. Which of these mats has the lower cost per ...” in 📘 Mathematics if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers