Ask Question
14 July, 20:53

Given the following relations on the set of all integers where (x, y) ∈R if and only if the following is satisfied. (Check ALL correct answers from the following lists) : (a) x+y=0

A. symmetric

B. transitive

C. antisymmetric

D. reflexive

E. irreflexive

(b) x-y is an integer

A. irreflexive

B. symmetric

C. reflexive

D. transitive

E. antisymmetric

(c) x=2y

A. irreflexive

B. antisymmetric

C. reflexive

D. symmetric

E. transitive

(d) xy>1

A. transitive

B. antisymmetric

C. irreflexive

D. symmetric

E. reflexive

+1
Answers (1)
  1. 14 July, 22:10
    0
    a) symmetric

    b) symmetric, reflexive, transitive

    c) antisymmetric

    d) symmetric

    Step-by-step explanation:

    (a) x+y = 0

    - this relation is not reflexive, because the only element that relates with itself is 0. x+x = 2x, x+x = 0 only if 2x = 0, hence x = 0. Since 0 relates with itself, then the relation isnt irreflexive either.

    Note that for x, y such that x R y, we have that x+y = 0, therefore, y = - x.

    -If x, y, z are such that x R y, y R z, then y = - x, z = - y = - (-x) = x. In general x does not relate with z because z=x and the relation isnt reflexive, thus the relation is not transitive. For example, if x = z = 2, y = - 2, we have that xRy, yRz, but x does not relate with z.

    - This realtion is symmetric due to the commutativity of the sum. If xRy, then x+y = 0, and y+x = x+y = 0, hence yRx. Therefore, the relation cant be antisymmetric, because every element different from 0 relates to its opposite. For example 2R-2, - 2R2 but 2 ≠ - 2.

    b) x-y is an integer

    Since we are taking the substraction of two integers, the result will always be integer. Hence, every pair of elements relate within each other. As a result, the relation is symmetric, reflexive and transitive. However, it is not irreflexive nor antisymmetric, because for example 4R4, and 4R8, 8R4, but 4 is not 8.

    c) x = 2y

    Note that x = 2x only if x = 0, so the relation is neither reflexive nor irreflexive.

    The relation is not symmetric, for example, 4R2 because 4 = 2*2, but 2 does not relate with 4, because 4*2 = 8. However, the relation is antisymmetric, because if xRy, yR2, we have

    x = 2y y = 2x = 2 (2y) = 4y

    since y = 4y, y should be 0, and x = 2*0 = 0. Therefore x=y = 0. The relation is antisymmetric.

    The relation isnt transitive: 2R4, 4R8, but 2 does not relate with 8 because 8*2 = 16.

    d) xy>1

    since 0² = 0, 0 does not relate with itself, hence the relation is not reflexive. It is not irreflexive either, because, for example, 2*2 = 4 > 2, thus 2 relates with itself.

    The relation is not transitive: 1 relates with every integer greater than itself, but it does not relate with itself, for example 1R7 and 7R1 because 1*7=7*1 = 7 > 1, but 1*1 = 1, it is not greater than 1, hence 1 doesnt relate with itself. This also shows that the relation is not antisymmetric either, because 1R7, 7R1 but 1≠7. The relation, however, is symmetric due to the commutativity of the product. If xy > 1, then yx = xy >1 as well.

    I hope that works for you!
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Given the following relations on the set of all integers where (x, y) ∈R if and only if the following is satisfied. (Check ALL correct ...” in 📘 Mathematics if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers