Ask Question
1 June, 12:32

Identify the fallacies of weak induction committed by the following arguments, giving a brief explanation for your answer. If no fallacy is committed, write "no fallacy." There is substantial evidence that units of the Chinese military hack into the computers of American technology companies to steal intellectual property and trade secrets. But Chinese Premier Li Keqiang denies that this happens. Therefore, given Mr. Li's intimate knowledge of the Chinese military, we must conclude that the Chinese military does not engage in hacking.

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 1 June, 13:21
    0
    The correct answer is: Appeal to false authority. He is obvisouly biased
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Identify the fallacies of weak induction committed by the following arguments, giving a brief explanation for your answer. If no fallacy is ...” in 📘 Mathematics if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers