Ask Question
12 April, 04:47

When looking at a rational function, Jamal and Angie have two different thoughts. Jamal says that the function is defined at x = - 3, x = - 4, and x = 6. Angie says that the function is undefined at those x values. Describe a situation where Jamal is correct, and describe a situation where Angie is correct. Is it possible for a situation to exist that they are both correct? Justify your reasoning.

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 12 April, 05:07
    0
    Rational function is a function that contains a fraction.

    Jamal is correct if the numerator of the fraction contains the variable x and its denominator is an integer that is not 0.

    Angie is correct if the denominator of the fraction contains the variable x and substituting the value of x will result to a denominator of 0.

    A rational function can't be a function if its denominator is 0.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “When looking at a rational function, Jamal and Angie have two different thoughts. Jamal says that the function is defined at x = - 3, x = - ...” in 📘 Mathematics if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers