Ask Question
30 May, 17:09

The US Department of Energy reported that 48% of homes were heated by natural gas. A random sample of 333 homes in Oregon found that 149 were heated by natural gas. Test the claim that proportion of homes in Oregon that were heated by natural gas is different from what was reported. Use a 1% significance level.

+5
Answers (1)
  1. 30 May, 20:03
    0
    Option B) Do not reject null hypothesis, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion of homes in Oregon heated by natural gas is different from the 48% that the US Department of Energy reported.

    Step-by-step explanation:

    We are given the following in the question:

    Sample size, n = 333

    p = 48% = 0.48

    Alpha, α = 0.01

    Number of women belonging to union, x = 149

    First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis

    This is a two-tailed test.

    Formula:

    Putting the values, we get,

    Now, we calculate the p-value from the table.

    P-value = 0.273079

    Since the p-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and accept the null hypothesis.

    Thus, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that proportion of homes in Oregon that were heated by natural gas is different from what was reported.

    B. Do not reject null hypothesis, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion of homes in Oregon heated by natural gas is different from the 48% that the US Department of Energy reported.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “The US Department of Energy reported that 48% of homes were heated by natural gas. A random sample of 333 homes in Oregon found that 149 ...” in 📘 Mathematics if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers