Ask Question
17 August, 02:15

Why is Wikipedia not considered to be a credible source?

A. The information was written elsewhere.

B. Anyone can post anonymous entries,

C. There are no listed source references,

D. The site is considered to be in the public domain.

+4
Answers (2)
  1. 17 August, 02:35
    0
    B. Anyone can post anonymous entries.

    Step-by-step explanation:

    This is the most likely Answer considering it is 100% true, anyone can write anything even if it is their own opinion, which could lead to false information. This is also considered to be a public domain considering anyone can write and publish and edit what they would like to on Wikipedia.
  2. 17 August, 05:42
    0
    Answer: b
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Why is Wikipedia not considered to be a credible source? A. The information was written elsewhere. B. Anyone can post anonymous entries, C. ...” in 📘 Mathematics if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers