Why is Wikipedia not considered to be a credible source?
A. The information was written elsewhere.
B. Anyone can post anonymous entries,
C. There are no listed source references,
D. The site is considered to be in the public domain.
Answers (2)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Why is Wikipedia not considered to be a credible source? A. The information was written elsewhere. B. Anyone can post anonymous entries, C. ...” in 📘 Mathematics if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
6 people want vanilla twelve people want chocolate what is the percent of the people who want chocolate?
Answers (2)
For his exercise last weekend Bentito walked 5 miles and jogged 2 miles what is the ratio of the miles walked to the total number of miles of exercise. Elsa chose answer A as the correct answer. How did she get that answer
Answers (1)
All real numbers w that are less than - 7 0r greater than 14
Answers (1)
A checking account is overdrawn if it has negative balance marc's account is overdrawn by 35. what will the balance be after he deposits 116 and writes a check for 48?
Answers (1)
The world's narrowest electric vehicle is about 35 inches wide. How wide is this vehicle to the nearest foot?
Answers (1)
New Questions in Mathematics
Three friends split the cost of a pizza and a salad. The pizza cost$15 and the salad cost $6. Which expression can you use to find how much each person owes
Answers (2)
How do you write 8.4% as a fraction in simplest form
Answers (1)
13. Which equation has no solution? 5v + 3 = 5v - 5 2x - 4 = 2x + 7 - x 2y + 5 - y = 2y - 3 (y - 6) 7z + 9 = - 7z - 6
Answers (1)
Luke drove 150 miles in 4 hours. What was his average speed?
Answers (2)
Factor the expression completely over the complex numbers. x^3-4x^2+4x-16
Answers (1)