Ask Question
12 February, 17:17

A light bulb manufacturer claims that a certain type of bulb they make has a mean lifetime of 1000 hours and a standard deviation of 20 hours. Each package sold contains 4 of these bulbs. Suppose that each package represents an SRS of bulbs, and we calculate the sample mean lifetime / bar x x ˉ x, with, / bar, on top of the bulbs in each package. 1. What is the null and alternative hypotheses? 2. At a =.02, do you have enough evidence to reject the manufacturer's claim?

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 12 February, 17:32
    0
    Step-by-step explanation:

    1. The null hypothesis contains "equal" sign ("=" or "≥" or "≤"), the alternative hypothesis is the complement to the null hypothesis. The claim is "the mean life of a certain type of light bulb is at least 1000 hours". As the claim contains "≥" sign, it is null hypothesis.

    H0: µ ≥ 1000

    Alternative hypothesis:

    The alternative hypothesis is the complement: "the mean life of a certain type of light bulb is less

    than 1000 hours".

    Ha: µ < 1000

    b. As the alternative hypothesis contains "<" sign, the test is left-tailed. Using α = 0.02, we obtain critical value from standard table of normal distribution:

    z0 = - 1.54

    Thus, the rejection region for the test statistic is z < - 1.54.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “A light bulb manufacturer claims that a certain type of bulb they make has a mean lifetime of 1000 hours and a standard deviation of 20 ...” in 📘 Mathematics if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers