Ask Question
5 August, 11:50

How does an indirect proof differ from a regular proof?

+3
Answers (2)
  1. 5 August, 12:55
    0
    Regular proof is all about known facts that is for e. g X must be true, while in indirect proof you assume X is true
  2. 5 August, 13:58
    0
    Answer and Step-by-step explanation:

    Regular proof is a method of proving the statement directly.

    In this method, we just proved it by using direct formula or theorem.

    whereas,

    Indirect proof is a way of proving by contradiction.

    In this method we assume first that the given statement is false, then it is proved correct by contradiction.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “How does an indirect proof differ from a regular proof? ...” in 📘 Mathematics if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers