Suppose that the growth rate of children looks like a straight line if the height of a child is observed at the ages of 24 months, 28 months, 32 months, and 36 months. If you use the regression obtained from these ages and predict the height of the child at 21 years, you might find that the predicted height is 20 feet. What is wrong with the prediction and the process used?

Question

Mathematics

Jaylee Blevins

1 September, 03:59

Suppose that the growth rate of children looks like a straight line if the height of a child is observed at the ages of 24 months, 28 months, 32 months, and 36 months. If you use the regression obtained from these ages and predict the height of the child at 21 years, you might find that the predicted height is 20 feet. What is wrong with the prediction and the process used?

+4

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Ruffles · Answer 1

The supposition is incorrect.

Step-by-step explanation:

The growth rate of a child is not constant, so height versus time does not look like a straight line. Nothing is wrong with the prediction made using the false assumption. You can conclude anything you like when you start with a false premise.