Ask Question
1 March, 21:25

Which option identifies a factor that would make the reasoning for a claim scientifically invalid?

A) a lack of sufficient funding to test the claim

B) a lack of interest from the community to test the claim

C) a lack of supporting empirical evidence

D) a lack of acceptance from scientific organizations

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 1 March, 22:23
    0
    C) a lack of supporting empirical evidence

    Explanation:

    A scientific reasoning can be rendered invalid if empirical evidences are lacking. Empirical evidences are usually a product of observations or experiments.

    When these are lacking or cannot be gathered, scientific observations or sometimes reasoning can be rendered as invalid because there is no ground to prove them.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Which option identifies a factor that would make the reasoning for a claim scientifically invalid? A) a lack of sufficient funding to test ...” in 📘 Physics if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers