What do you think is the difference between being imaginative in doing science and Doing pseudoscience?

I would say that being imaginative in science means finding new ways to find or analyse the data, but which do not make the data false or which do not manipulate the data. Being imaginative in science should not cross the boundary of making the science not reliable

Being imaginative in pseudoscience could mean manipulating the data or even making experiments in such a way as to only obtaining specific data or throwing away certain data.