Guest

26 July, 21:44

The condorcet paradox shows that

a. the order on which things are voted can affect the result.

b. problems in counting votes can negate legitimate democratic outcomes.

c. allocations of resources based on majority rule are always inefficient.

d. transitive preferences are inconsistent with rationality.

+1

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Not Sure About the Answer?

Find an answer to your question ✅ “The condorcet paradox shows that a. the order on which things are voted can affect the result. b. problems in counting votes can negate ...” in 📘 Social Studies if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.

Search for Other Answers

You Might be Interested in

Which party assigns delegates proportionally during the Iowa caucus? A) Republican Party B) Democratic Party C) Green Party D) libertarian party

What is holding to traditional attitudes and values and cautions about change or innovation

Who are the members included in the organization of American states

Who were the first Europeans to settle in Canada about A. D. 1000?

Does watching the news affect fear of terrorism? the importance of media exposure on terrorism fear

New Questions in Social Studies

Which South Carolinian spoke out against integrating public schools in South Carolina? a. Modjeska Simkins. b. Strom Thurmond. c. Matthew Perry. d. Septima Clark.

Siddhartha Gautama left home at age 30 to find answers to his questions about

The difference in Decision Making Under Risk and decision making under uncertainty is that under risk, we think we know the probabilities of the states of nature, while under uncertainty we do not know the probabilities of the states of nature.

What values were displayed in the Texas fight for independence from Mexico?

Laws that regulate the American economy, social issues, and political participation are all examples of what governmental action?