Ask Question
16 January, 07:06

An argument against euthanasia asserting that mercy killing would involve treating persons as mere things and of no more value than of a beast draws on

+2
Answers (1)
  1. 16 January, 09:07
    0
    An argument against euthanasia asserting that mercy killing would involve treating persons as mere things and of no more value than of a beast draws on " Kant’s categorical imperative".

    The Categorical Imperative should give an approach to us to assess moral activities and to make moral judgments. It's anything but a charge to perform particular activities - it doesn't state, "take after the 10 instructions", or "regard your senior citizens". It is basically "exhaust" - it is just formal technique by which to assess any activity about which may be ethically important.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “An argument against euthanasia asserting that mercy killing would involve treating persons as mere things and of no more value than of a ...” in 📘 Social Studies if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers