Ask Question
10 February, 02:51

As explained in your textbook, public speakers have an ethical obligation to avoid name-calling and other forms of abusive language because such language

a. is forbidden by the first amendment to the u. s. constitution.

b. violates current standards of political correctness on college campuses.

c. changes meaning based on the frame of reference of the audience.

d. is used by speakers who are not fully prepared for their presentations.

e. demeans the personal dignity of the groups or individuals being attacked.

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 10 February, 04:26
    0
    One should mind the language they are using to convey their opinions if they are speaking in a public place because this way of talking will be emulated by lesser known people and the people who hear them. This speeches can sometimes become dis-respectable to the audience and causes chaos too. So the correct statements in this scenario are

    e. demeans the dignity of the groups or individuals being attacked

    a. is forbidden by the first amendment to the u. s.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “As explained in your textbook, public speakers have an ethical obligation to avoid name-calling and other forms of abusive language because ...” in 📘 Social Studies if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers