Ask Question
7 July, 12:36

In lemon v. kurtzman (1971), the supreme court justices ruled that government action toward religion is a. permissible only if it is secular in purpose, neither promotes nor inhibits religion, and does not lead to excessive entanglement with religion. b. permissible only if it promotes religious organizations that have a large number of members. c. permissible only if it promotes religious organizations that have a small number of members. d. permissible only if it inhibits religious organizations who espouse anti-american beliefs. e. never permissible.

+2
Answers (1)
  1. 7 July, 14:43
    0
    I believe the answer is: Permissible only if it is secular in purpose, neither promotes nor inhibits religion, and does not lead to excessive entanglement with religion.

    For example, when a certain religion advocate their followers to conduct harm towards other people.

    In this case, the religion conducted an infringement for other people's right as a citizens and the government has proper ground to intervene.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “In lemon v. kurtzman (1971), the supreme court justices ruled that government action toward religion is a. permissible only if it is ...” in 📘 Social Studies if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers