Which of the following United States Supreme Court cases extended the powers of the police to search vehicles for drugs with a trained dog without the need for any particular reason to suspect a narcotics violation?

a. Wolf vs Colorado

b. Mapp vs Ohio

c. Illinois vs Caballes

d. Harris vs United States

Illinois vs Caballes

Explanation:

The case was evident when a court in Illinois convicted Caballes for carrying Cannabis. There was a search of Caballes by the police using sniff dogs and the court affirmed that the scope of the traffic stop was permissible and it was effected by the principles of Terry V. Ohio. It was further discussed that the road traffic stop in this subject matter do satisfy the Fourth Amendment standards if it were to be seen as a terry stop.