g: Distinguish between protected and unprotected conduct under the National Labor Relations Act. Choose the side of the employer or employee, and debate the protection afforded to the side you have chosen. What arguments could be made for the opposite side? Your journal entry must be at least 200 words. No references or citations are necessary.

Answer explained below

Explanation:

The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), or the Wagner Act was introduced to the Senate and passed in the Senate in 1935. The passing of this labour policy changed the national narrative regarding labour rights and policies. Workers were now federally protected to organize and bargain collectively through representatives they choose, who would have their best interest. The NLRA gave rise to unions which were instrumental in fighting for fair wages, safe working conditions and standard working hours for members in the union because prior to unions and the NLRA, workers were subjected to long hours, unsafe working conditions and low wages. However, the NLRA protects workers that are not members of a union. Specifically, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) protects employee rights to engage in "concerted activity", which is when two or more employees act for their mutual aid or protection around the terms and conditions of employment.

With regards to protections under National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) freedom of speech can be challenging in the age of social media and clearly employers are attempting to place restrictions on how employees communicate about the working environment and how they feel about their employers.

Protected activities under NLRA include addressing improvement in pay with the company, employers discussing with one another safety concerns and other work-related issues including salary. Also speaking to the employer on behalf of co-workers. These protections do not include those employed by a federal, state or local city government, independent contractors and employees subject to the Railway Labor Act, which covers railroad and airline employees. I believe that employees were protected by the federal government to peacefully form or attempt to form a union, join a union and be represented by a union is fair because workers represented by ethical union representatives can bargain collectively because employers have immense power and resources at their disposable to fight legal suits from individuals. However, employers may incur expenses when attempting to meet the obligations of collective bargaining agreements, therefore, limit employment opportunities.