Ask Question
2 November, 22:57

Question: According to the Supreme Court, is the Indian Removal Act constitutional or

unconstitutional? What is their reasoning?

+1
Answers (2)
  1. 3 November, 00:32
    0
    Answer:unconstitutional
  2. 3 November, 02:50
    0
    It was unconstitutional because traditionally, no tribal government or chief held authority over all the Cherokees. But in 1721, South Carolina colonists succeeded in persuading the Cherokees to choose a principal chief for the entire tribe to negotiate selling some of its hunting grounds.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Question: According to the Supreme Court, is the Indian Removal Act constitutional or unconstitutional? What is their reasoning? ...” in 📘 Social Studies if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers