Ask Question
12 June, 17:24

At first glance, the research reported in the Washington Post article Why We've Been Hugely Underestimating the Overfishing of the Oceans may appear to be only bad news for the world's stock of fish. However, researchers believe that their discovery of how much overfishing has been underestimated could also be good news. Determine whether each statement should be considered good news or bad news based on the information in the article. Good news Bad news Answer Bank

+1
Answers (1)
  1. 12 June, 19:01
    0
    The description of the given question is described in the explanation section below.

    Explanation:

    Good news:

    When the grab hit its peak in the fishery was far more efficient than previously believed. This demonstrates that there are more fish throughout the inventory. Fisheries seem to be in a position to nourish more individuals than originally or previously understood.

    Bad news:

    Legislation on the use of FAO information collected could've been badly communicated even though FAO data doesn't reflect reality, as this provides incorrect data. Self-sustaining demand for fish could be at risk as a result of the fishing industry holding much more fish just as thought previously.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “At first glance, the research reported in the Washington Post article Why We've Been Hugely Underestimating the Overfishing of the Oceans ...” in 📘 Social Studies if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers