Ask Question
8 May, 17:20

Compare and contrast a court "precedent" and a president "precedent"

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 8 May, 18:12
    0
    Court precedents are used in case of having no clear interpretation of the law for a particular case. President's precedents are simply acts performed by a President in a similar situation.

    Explanation:

    Court precedents serve as an alternate to written laws when the existing guided laws are not suitable or simply not enough for a particular situation that arises.

    For this, the court can refer to a previous judgement as basis for their own judgement. Thus, court precedents are enforceable by law.

    Precedents set by a President serve at best, as guidelines.

    They are simply acts performed by a previous President when met with a similar situation.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Compare and contrast a court "precedent" and a president "precedent" ...” in 📘 Social Studies if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers