Ask Question
16 December, 18:38

he principle of an eye for an eye A. does not take intentions into account in determining punishment. B. cannot tell us how to punish crimes that have not harmed anyone. C. sometimes prescribes punishments that seem deeply immoral. D. all of the above

+5
Answers (1)
  1. 16 December, 19:25
    0
    D. all of the above

    Explanation:

    The principle of an eye for an eye does not take intentions into account, this is true because some acts of crime are accidental. Let's take a car accident that claims the life of a passerby, according to an eye for an eye, the driver of the vehicle will also be killed even though the manslaughter committed was not intentional.

    Secondly, this principle does not have a provision for crimes which do not cause anyone direct harm, for example cutting electric supply to an area does not directly harm anyone, how would such a crime be punish under the principle of an eye for an is unanswered.

    Lastly, the prescribed punishments seem immoral sometimes.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “he principle of an eye for an eye A. does not take intentions into account in determining punishment. B. cannot tell us how to punish ...” in 📘 Social Studies if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers