Ask Question
27 March, 14:43

In which of the following scenarios would the journalist most easily be protected from a libel claim?

The information in the article was true. But it cost the plaintiff thousands of dollars in lost revenue

The information in the article came from the reporter overhearing a private conversation between the mayor and vice mayor during a break in the city council meeting. The mayor said he heard a local business owner was going to lose his business license because of some failed inspections. The reporter writes a blurb in the paper, quoting the mayor, but the information ends up being false

The facts are incorrect, but the reporter has a strong argument that it was an opinion piece, and not a regular news story. The reporter is normally a news reporter and not an opinion columnist.

+1
Answers (1)
  1. 27 March, 15:30
    0
    The information in the article was true. But it cost the plaintiff thousands of dollars in lost revenue

    Explanation:

    The definition of libel is a written and published false statement about someone that damages their reputation. An example of libel is when someone writes in a newspaper that you are a thief, even though this is false. a libel claim simply means defamation. The journalist can easily be protected from a libel claim if the information in the article was true. But it cost the plaintiff thousands of dollars in lost revenue
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “In which of the following scenarios would the journalist most easily be protected from a libel claim? The information in the article was ...” in 📘 Social Studies if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers