Ask Question
17 December, 20:12

Stan, an air conditioning and heating technician, files suit against Temp-Set Corporation, alleging that its thermostats are unreasonably dangerous due to the possibility of electrical shock while being installed. Temp-Set's best defense is most likely

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 17 December, 20:18
    0
    b. knowledgeable user.

    Explanation:

    In the scenario stated in the question, the best line of defense by Temp-Set is than Stan is already a knowledgeable user who is aware of the dangers of the thermostats and thus there is no need for warning. Temp-Set's best defense is most likely knowledgeable user. When a particular danger is commonly known by the user of a product, there is no need for the manufacturer to warn the user of such product. For example, McDonald chicken contain high cholesterol, this is a common knowledge and as such there will not be the need to warn the consumers.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Stan, an air conditioning and heating technician, files suit against Temp-Set Corporation, alleging that its thermostats are unreasonably ...” in 📘 Social Studies if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers