Ask Question
2 May, 14:03

Which of the following is not true about the decline in demand for unions in the U. S.? To some extent, protective legislation ensuring safety and income security has served to replace union representation. It can be largely attributed to the fact that individuals who experience union representation are unhappy with it and decide they do not want it. U. S. unions have not put enough money into union organizing and have therefore not done a good job of "selling" their services. Employers may be more likely to listen to their employees and respond to their changing needs thus reducing employees' need for outside representation.

+5
Answers (1)
  1. 2 May, 16:56
    0
    B. It can be largely attributed to the fact that individuals who experience union representation are unhappy with it and decide they do not want it.

    Explanation:

    It isn't a fact that most individuals who experience union representation are unhappy with it and they decide to not want the union. So you couldn't attribute this as a fact about the decline in demands for unions. Studies have found that unionized workers remain more time in their jobs in comparison to non unionized.

    Bender, K. A., & Sloane, P. J. (1998). Job Satisfaction, Trade Unions, and Exit-Voice Revisited. ILR Review, 51 (2), 222-240.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Which of the following is not true about the decline in demand for unions in the U. S.? To some extent, protective legislation ensuring ...” in 📘 Social Studies if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers