Which, if any, of Gibson's arguments against judicial review remain relevant today?
a-Legislators are the repository of the people's sovereignty, and the exercise of judicial review is an act of sovereignty, which should reside with the legislators or the people.
b-Judicial review could lead to political turmoil if the other branches of government, or the states, refuse to acquiesce to the court's interpretation of the constitution.
c-Judicial review makes the judiciary equal or even superior to the legislator, even though judges are not elected.
d-All officers of the government take an oath to support the constitution and therefore all must consider the constitutionality of their actions.
e-The judiciary is not infallible. Judges' errors in interpreting the Constitution cannot be corrected at the ballot box, only by Constitutional amendment.
+1
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Which, if any, of Gibson's arguments against judicial review remain relevant today? a-Legislators are the repository of the people's ...” in 📘 Social Studies if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Home » Social Studies » Which, if any, of Gibson's arguments against judicial review remain relevant today? a-Legislators are the repository of the people's sovereignty, and the exercise of judicial review is an act of sovereignty, which should reside with the legislators