The conclusion from the experiment in which a chess master and a chess novice (beginner) were asked to remember the positions of chess pieces on a chess board was that: A chess masters outperform novices in all conditions. B chess masters have developed better memory skills than novices. C novices do better because they are not distracted by irrelevant knowledge about previous chess games. D chess masters did better only when possible real game arrangements were used.

Question

Social Studies

Guest

3 April, 17:44

The conclusion from the experiment in which a chess master and a chess novice (beginner) were asked to remember the positions of chess pieces on a chess board was that: A chess masters outperform novices in all conditions. B chess masters have developed better memory skills than novices. C novices do better because they are not distracted by irrelevant knowledge about previous chess games. D chess masters did better only when possible real game arrangements were used.

+1

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Chad Bruce · Answer 1

Answer:B chess masters have developed better memory skills than novices.

Explanation: DeGroot in 1965 carried out a research concerning the performance of Chess masters, experienced players and Novices in a chess game.

De Groot in 1965 discovered that Chess masters and experienced players have developed memory skills than Novices and are able to were able to remember the positions and the configuration of chess pieces on a chess board.