Ask Question
1 December, 15:10

Adam moved into an apartment complex. The rules of the complex prohibit unmarried men and women from living together in the same apartment. When Adam's friend, Diane, moved into the apartment he was served with eviction papers. Adam claims the apartment complex is violating his constitutional rights since it allows married couples to live together. Is Adam right? a. Yes. His equal protection rights have been violated. b. No. His fundamental right of cohabitation has not been violated. c. Yes. He and Diane are being treated differently than married couples. d. No. Constitutional protections do not extend to privatelyowned apartment complexes.

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 1 December, 17:30
    0
    No, Adam is not correct. Constitutional protections do not extend to privately-owned apartment complexes.

    Explanation
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Adam moved into an apartment complex. The rules of the complex prohibit unmarried men and women from living together in the same apartment. ...” in 📘 Social Studies if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers